For anyone considering a pre-owned Mercedes-Benz CLK, the 2005 model year often emerges as a sweet spot. After extensive research, comparing brochures and driving experiences, I landed on a 2005 CLK 500, and here’s why it might be the right choice for you too. My journey into Mercedes-Benz ownership began with a deep dive into the specifics of the CLK range, particularly the 2005 and 2006 models, and I want to share those insights.
One of the initial draws to the 2005 CLK was the availability of aluminum interior trim. This detail offered a sportier aesthetic that appealed to me. Beyond aesthetics, the 2005 CLK also boasted the 7-speed transmission, a significant upgrade in terms of performance and driving experience. Visually, the older style tail lights of the 2005 model were also preferable to my eye.
The pivotal moment came when I test drove both the CLK 350 and the CLK 500. While the CLK 350 with its V6 engine is undoubtedly capable, the performance of the CLK 500’s V8 engine was simply in another league. The robust power and effortless acceleration of the 500 made it clear that this was the engine that would truly satisfy my driving desires.
When comparing the 2005 and 2006 CLK models more closely, a few key differences emerged. The wood steering wheel became an option in 2006, but opting for it meant sacrificing the paddle shifters – a feature I highly valued for a more engaging driving experience. The tail lights were indeed updated on the 2006 models, a point of visual distinction. Furthermore, the 2006 CLK 500 gained courtesy fog lamps that illuminate when the turn indicator is activated, a feature standard on the 2005 V6 models but not the 2005 CLK 500.
My personal 2005 CLK 500 is equipped with almost every available option for that year, thankfully including the paddle shifters (avoiding the wood steering wheel trade-off) but missing only the park distance control. To further enhance the driving experience, I’ve added a Kleemann limited-slip differential (LSD) and an AMG exhaust system with quad tips, alongside smoked tail lights for a unique look. The two-tone red and black interior, an exclusive option for the 2005 model year, combined with the aluminum trim, sealed the deal for me when I found this particular car. Even a Mercedes-Benz shop foreman confirmed its excellent condition. While the 7-speed transmission can have minor quirks, any necessary adjustments seem to have been effectively addressed.
Ultimately, the best Mercedes-Benz CLK for you depends on your individual priorities. Fuel economy has never been a primary concern in my car buying decisions; instead, I focus on finding a car that perfectly matches my desired specifications and features. Whether you lean towards the 350 or the 500, I believe you’ll find satisfaction in owning a Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Before acquiring the CLK 500, I owned a highly-spec’d 2005 MINI Cooper S hardtop. Being involved in the MINI community as the 2008 President of a local club, the decision to part with one of our MINIs (keeping a John Cooper Works cabriolet) was significant.
Here are a few images of my previous MINI Cooper S:
And here’s a picture of both the MINI and the Mercedes-Benz CLK together:
